CRP at early follicular phase of menstrual cycle can cause misinterpretation for cardiovascular risk assessment

View/ Open
Access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDate
2015Author
Gürsoy, Aslı YarcıÇağlar, Gamze Sinem
Kiseli, Mine
Pabuçcu, Emre
Çandar, Tuba
Demirtaş, Selda
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Gursoy, A. Y., Caglar, G. S., Kiseli, M., Pabuccu, E., Candar, T., & Demirtas, S. (2015). CRP at early follicular phase of menstrual cycle can cause misinterpretation for cardiovascular risk assessment. Interventional Medicine and Applied Science, 7(4), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1556/1646.7.2015.4.2Abstract
Objective: C-reactive protein (CRP) is a well-known marker of infl ammation and infection in clinical practice. This study is designed
to evaluate CRP levels in diff erent phases of menstrual cycle, which might end up with misleading conclusions especially when used for
cardiovascular risk assessment. Methods: Twenty-seven women were eligible for the cross-sectional study. Venous blood samples from each
participant were collected twice during the menstrual cycle. The fi rst sampling was held at 2nd to 5th days of the menstrual cycle for FSH,
estradiol, CRP, and sedimentation, and the second was done at 21st to 24th days of the menstrual cycle for measurement of progesterone,
CRP, and sedimentation values. Results: CRP values were signifi cantly higher in the early follicular phase compared to luteal phase (1.8 mg/L
[0.3–7.67] vs. 0.7 mg/L [0.1–8.3], p < 0.001, respectively). In both phases of the menstrual cycle, sedimentation rate was similar (12.1 ± 6.7
vs. 12.3 ± 7.7; p = 0.717, respectively). Conclusions: CRP levels in early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle (menstruation) are signifi cantly
higher than CRP levels in luteal phase of the same cycle. In reproductive age women, detection of CRP for cardiovascular risk assessment
during menstruation might not be appropriate.