Evaluation of perimandibular neurovascularization with accessory mental foramina using cone-beam computed tomography in children

View/ Open
Access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDate
2013Author
Orhan, Ayşe IşılOrhan, Kaan
Aksoy, Seçil
Özgül, Özkan
Horasan, Sinan
Arslan, Ahmet
Koçyiğit, Doruk
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Orhan, A. I., Orhan, K., Aksoy, S., Ozgul, O., Horasan, S., Arslan, A., & Kocyigit, D. (2013). Evaluation of Perimandibular Neurovascularization With Accessory Mental Foramina Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Children. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 24(4), e365–e369. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e3182902f49Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to clarify the perimandibular
neurovascularization with mandibular accessory mental
foramina in a children population using cone-beam computed
tomography (CBCT) to avoid complications during anesthetic and
surgical procedures.
Methods: This retrospective study evaluated cone-beam CT images
for bifid mandibular canals in the mandibles of 63 children
(35 girls, 28 boys; age range, 7Y16 years; mean age, 12.3 years).
Both right and left sides were examined from CT images (n = 126),
including axial, sagittal, cross-sectional, and panoramic views as
well as reconstructed three-dimensional images, as necessary. The
course, length, and superior and inferior angles between canalswere
classified and measured.
Results: Bifid mandibular canals were observed in 34 (27%) of
the 126 sides examined. The most frequently encountered type of
bifid canal was the retromolar canal (11.1%), followed by the forward
(7.14%), buccolingual (6.35%), and dental canal (2.4%). Mean
lengths of bifid canals were 10.2 mm on the right side and 10.6 mm
on the left side. Mean superior angles were 131 degrees on the right
side and 147 degrees on the left side, whereas mean inferior angles
were 47 degrees on the right side and 34 degrees on the left side.
No statistically significant differences were found in the lengths or
angles between the right and left sides or between boys and girls
(P G 0.05). The most common position for the mental foramen was
between the first and second premolars, and an accessory mental
foramen was observed in 4 children (6.34%).
Conclusions: This study utilized CBCT images to identify bifid
mandibular canals and accessory mental foramina in children.
Cone-beam CTwas found to be a useful technique for detecting secondary
canals. However, despite the fact that CBCT uses less ionizing
radiation than other types of three-dimensional imaging,
unless the diagnostic information provided through CBCT improves
treatment results, CBCT should not be recommended for
use in children or adolescents.