dc.contributor.author | Evrin, Togay | |
dc.contributor.author | Sonmez, Leyla Ozturk | |
dc.contributor.author | Gadek, Lezsek | |
dc.contributor.author | Pruc, Michal | |
dc.contributor.author | Navolokina, Alla | |
dc.contributor.author | Wieczorek, Wojciech | |
dc.contributor.author | Cyran, Maciej | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-16T18:30:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-16T18:30:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1306-696X | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1307-7945 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2022.45682 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1188747 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14065/5620 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to determine the efficacy of intubation with VieScope (R) and Macintosh laryngoscope in different scenarios of simulated COVID-19 patients by paramedics wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) for aerosol generMETHODS: Study was designed as a prospective, observational, randomized, crossover simulation trial. 37 paramedics took part in the study. They performed endotracheal intubation (ETI) of a person suspected of COVID-19. Intubation was performed using VieScope (R) and Macintosh laryngoscopes in two research scenarios: Scenario A - normal airway and Scenario B - difficult airway. Both theRESULTS: In Scenario A, time to intubation using VieScope (R) and Macintosh laryngoscope amounted to 35.3 (IQR; 32-40) seconds and 35.8 (IQR: 30-40)s, respectively. Nearly all participants performed ETI successfully both with VieScope (R) and Macintosh laryngoscope (100% vs. 94.6%). In scenario B, intubation with the VieScope (R), compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope, was associated with a shorter intubation time (p<0.001), a higher success rate of the first intubation attempt (p<0.001), a better visualization degree glottisCONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that the use of a VieScope (R) compared to Macintosh laryngoscope in difficult airway intubation performed by paramedics wearing PPE-AGP is associated with shorter intubation times, greater intubation efficiency as well as better visualization of the glottis. Additional clinical trials are necessary to confirm the obtained results. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Turkish Assoc Trauma Emergency Surgery | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Covid-19 | en_US |
dc.subject | Endotracheal Intubation | en_US |
dc.subject | Laryngoscope | en_US |
dc.subject | Macintosh | en_US |
dc.subject | Personal Protective Equipment | en_US |
dc.subject | Sars-Cov-2 | en_US |
dc.subject | Viescope ? | en_US |
dc.subject | Personal Protective Equipment | en_US |
dc.subject | Endotracheal Intubation | en_US |
dc.subject | Tracheal Intubation | en_US |
dc.subject | Video Laryngoscopy | en_US |
dc.subject | Resuscitation | en_US |
dc.subject | Access | en_US |
dc.subject | Mac | en_US |
dc.title | Impact of VieScope? on first-attempt success during simulated COVID-19 patients intubation: A randomized cross-over simulation trial | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.authorid | Pruc, Michal/0000-0002-2140-9732 | |
dc.authorid | Navolokina, Alla/0000-0003-1711-6002 | |
dc.department | Ufuk Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.14744/tjtes.2022.45682 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 29 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 463 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 470 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.authorwosid | Pruc, Michal/HKF-2573-2023 | |
dc.authorwosid | ÖZTÜRK SÖNMEZ, Leyla/HDL-7794-2022 | |
dc.authorwosid | Navolokina, Alla/HKM-6500-2023 | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000962405700003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85153473173 | en_US |
dc.identifier.trdizinid | 1188747 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 36995204 | en_US |