Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBostancı-Ceran, Başak
dc.contributor.authorTakmaz, Tamer
dc.contributor.authorCan, İzzet
dc.contributor.authorDemirok, Gülizar
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Betül Seher
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-10T19:43:58Z
dc.date.available2022-03-10T19:43:58Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationBasak Bostanci, C., Takmaz, T., Can, İ., Demirok, G. & Uysal, B.S. (2016). Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 46(3), 597–603. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tbtkmedical/issue/45669/575750
dc.identifier.issn1300-0144
dc.identifier.issn1303-6165
dc.identifier.urihttps://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TWpRNE1qZ3dNQT09
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14065/3839
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1403-24
dc.description.abstractBackground/aim: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and optical performance of 4 different multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). Materials and methods: Ninety eyes of 51 patients who received Reviol MFM 611, Reviol MFM 625, Acri.LISA, and ReSTOR SN6AD3 multifocal IOLs after cataract surgery were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were similar in terms of age, sex, cataract hardness and axial length. The mean outcome measures were uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), distance-corrected intermediate and near visual acuity (DCIVA, DCNVA), intra or postoperative complications, and contrast sensitivity (CS) results under mesopic conditions. The mean follow up period was 10.5 months (range: 6 12 months). Results: All cases were within ± 0.75 D of emmetropia. Postoperative increase in UDVA and DCNVA was statistically significant in all groups. The Acri.LISA group showed slightly lower DCIVA compared with the other IOLs. CS was clinically similar between the groups. None of the patients developed any early or late postoperative complication or neuroadaptation problem, which necessitated explantation of the lens. Conclusion: All four multifocal lens designs provided satisfactory visual functions and CS results in patients who fulfilled the criteria for multifocal lens implantation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCataract surgeryen_US
dc.subjectMultifocal IOLs
dc.subjectPhacoemulsification
dc.subjectPremium IOLs
dc.subjectPresbyopia
dc.titleClinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lensesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentTıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Göz Hastalıklarıen_US
dc.institutionauthorDemirok, Gülizar
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.3906/sag-1403-24
dc.identifier.volume46en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage597en_US
dc.identifier.endpage603
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid36992053100
dc.authorscopusid6504575900
dc.authorscopusid6701389298
dc.authorscopusid56964354000
dc.authorscopusid56154594400
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000374327500003
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84964054058
dc.identifier.trdizinidTWpRNE1qZ3dNQT09en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27513232


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record